Review Form
|
REVIEW FORM AND GUIDELINES ETHIOPIAN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY (EIJET)
1. Manuscript Number:..................................................................................... |
|
|
2. Manuscript Title…………….…………………………………………....................................... |
|
|
3. Date of Manuscript Receipt:………………………………………..................................... |
|
|
4. Date of Reviewers’ Report Submission:………………………................................... |
|
REVIEW AND EVALUATION COMMENTS:
Please provide detailed comments for each section of the manuscript
|
General Comments |
|
|
1. Title……………………………………....................................................................... |
|
|
2. Abstract ……………………………………................................................................ |
|
|
3. Introduction………………………………………………………….................................. |
|
|
4. Methodology…………………………………………………………................................. |
|
|
5. Results & Discussions………………………………………….................................. |
|
|
6. Conclusion, Contribution, and Recommendations………………..................... |
|
|
7. Novelty………………………………………………………………………………......................... |
|
|
8. Important Note……………………………………………………………………….................... |
|
|
9. Strengths and Weaknesses of the Manuscript………………………………………....... |
|
RECOMMENDATIONS
Kindly mark
|
1. Accept (without change/revision) |
|
|
2. Accept (with Minor changes/revision) |
|
|
3. Accept (with Major Changes/revision) |
|
|
4. Reject (Not suitable with specific reasons) |
|
Additional Comments for Editor or Author (If any)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Your insightful review comments and constructive criticism are invaluable in helping us improve the quality and clarity of the manuscript. We will carefully convey all of your comments and suggestions to the author (s) and revise the manuscript accordingly.
Reviewer Guidelines
- Review Objectively: Provide fair, constructive, and unbiased evaluations of manuscripts.
- Timeliness: Complete reviews within the agreed deadline.
- Content Evaluation: Assess originality, methodology, relevance, clarity, and contribution to the field.
- Confidentiality: Do not share or discuss the manuscript with others.
- Conflict of Interest: Decline review if any conflict exists with the authors or subject matter.
- Recommendations: Suggest acceptance, revision, or rejection with clear, reasoned justification.
Editor Guidelines
- Manuscript Assessment: Ensure submissions align with the journal's scope and quality standards.
- Peer Review Management: Assign appropriate reviewers and oversee the review process.
- Decision-Making: Make unbiased, timely decisions based on reviewer feedback and editorial judgment.
- Ethical Oversight: Maintain academic integrity, address conflicts of interest, and detect misconduct (e.g., plagiarism).
- Communication: Maintain clear, professional communication with authors, reviewers, and editorial staff.
- Confidentiality: Treat all submissions and review content with strict confidentiality.
